A day after John Ridley, ABC and the Walt Disney Company sued for discrimination and retaliation by a former employee, the Oscar winner is rejecting the claims.“The allegations against Mr. Ridley are false, and the allegation that Mr. Ridley is biased against Asian-Americans is preposterous,” says attorney Jennifer Redmond of the April 3 jury seeking filing by Asta Jonasson. “We look forward to proving as much in court,” the Sheppard Mullin partner added.Disney declined comment on the matter.As we mentioned in yesterday’s story below – Full disclosure: Shirley director/writer Ridley is the co-host of Deadline’s Doc Talk podcast.A former ABC director of development is taking the network, parent company Disney and John Ridley to court for gender, racial and economic discrimination, claiming they firing her when she complained about the alleged situation.In a nine-claim complaint filed Wednesday in Los Angeles Superior Court, Asta Jonasson says she was pink-slipped in 2022 after more than a decade at ABC after putting in writing her frequently mentioned grievances about being overlooked for promotions and underpaid. Seeking a jury trial, Jonasson wants a variety of unspecified damages from the trio of Disney, Ridley, and ABC. (Full disclosure: Oscar winner Ridley is the co-host of Deadline’s Doc Talk podcast.)After three years at the network/studio, Jonasson was assigned to Ridley’s International Famous Players Radio Picture Corporation in 2014 as a director of development. Over the more than six years she worked directly for Ridley and expressing dissatisfaction with her position and compensation, as well as the filmmaker’s attitudes, Jonasson and her Greenberg Gross attorneys declare “to her knowledge, ABC never attempted to investigate or remedy these complaints.”Listing off a litany of misconduct, including a professional associate of Ridley’s supposedly calling Jonasson a “b*tch” and the 12 Years A Slave screenplay scribe doing nothing about it, the plaintiff and her lawyers express a theory in the filing about what was really going on at IFPRPC for the woman of color."In reaction to Jonasson’s complaint of unlawful discrimination, Ridley expressed anger and dismissed her concerns,” the 21-page filing in LASC Wednesday says, also claiming Ridley was not in private the “advocate for equal pay for women and people of color” he seemed to be in public. “When Jonasson again inquired as to the reason why Ridley failed to provide her with previously promised career opportunities, Ridley responded that if he had allowed her to work on a freelance script that Jonasson ‘would have left’ him. It was clear that Ridley deeply valued Jonasson’s work and contributions and sought to jeopardize her career to keep her working for him for unequal pay.”You may recognize Jonasson’s name. In December last year, she sued Vin Diesel for sexual battery.Alleging that assault occurred in an Atlanta hotel room in 2010 during the filming of Fast Five. Having just been hired nine days beforehand as Diesel’s assistant, Jonasson said Samantha Vincent, the actor’s sister and head of his One Race production company, fired her hours after the alleged assault.Filed under California’s Sexual Abuse and Cover Up Accountability Act that lifted statutes of limitations, the Diesel suit seeks a number of unspecified damages. Diesel’s lawyer Bryan Freedman told Deadline last year that “Vin Diesel categorically denies this claim in its entirety.”Today, Disney/ABC declined comment on the legal action by Jonasson against them and Ridley. Representatives for Ridley did not respond to Deadline’s request for comment on the matter; if and when they do, we will update.One of Jonasson’s lawyers did have a comment to make on the filing today.“The entertainment industry has historically underpaid women and minorities as compared to white men who perform the same work,” said Claire-Lise Kutlay. “The law requires equal pay for equal work and protects employees who stand up for their rights,” the Greenberg Gross attorney added. “By filing this lawsuit, Ms. Jonasson adds her voice to this historic movement to combat injustice.”It should be noted that Disney is facing a class action suit from potentially thousands of past and present female employees for paying them less than men. First filed in 2019 by Walt Disney Studios staffers LaRonda Rasmussen and Karen Moore, the action claims that the media giant violated the Fair Employment & Housing Act and California’s Equal Pay Act. With Disney failing repeatedly to get the suit tossed out, the action is seeking at least $150 million in lost wages, and could grow in damages up to and beyond $300 million.
© 2024 Deadline.